[(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (ons,)-2 ( M)-3 (onsanto )]TJ 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.0332519 -39.599996 cm If the request is not reasonably related to any claim or defense, and if there is no good reason to go beyond the ordinary scope of discovery under Rule 26(b), take the time to explain why in your discovery response. T* BT /Contents [108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R] 7. C)-3 (i)-2.8 (v. P)-4 (r)2.9 (oc)4.8 (. q Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ Code Compliant Demand, Responses and Objections. [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ /Parent 15 0 R 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm 67.32 0 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm T* ET /Length 125 0 R endobj 291.35 0 Td Plaintiff will produce responsive documents only to the extent that such documents are in the possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Plaintiff's possession, custody, or control does not include any constructive possession that may be conferred by Plaintiff's right or power to compel the production of documents or information from third parties or to request their production from other divisions of the Department of Justice or agencies of the United States. 1 g (NRCP 36; JCRCP 36.) Case(s): U.S. five. )9.9 ( )]TJ [(de)4 (a)4.8 (dl)-2.7 (i)-2 (ne)4.6 (s )-1.8 (pr)1.1 (ovi)-1.9 (de)3.9 (d b)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10.9 (e)4 ( C)-2.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (or)3.8 (ni)-2.7 (a)4.7 ( C)-2.9 (ode)3.9 ( of)2.1 ( C)-2 (i)-2 (vi)-12 (l)-2 ( P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4 (e)3.2 (dur)3 (e)4.8 (. T* /Annots [] >> /Fm0 Do 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm stream
(5)Tj -154.07 -24 Td (12)Tj /OCProperties 2 0 R (20)Tj /Annots [] (15)Tj >> q Documents already produced will not be produced again. endobj In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. T* [(P)11 (L)-3 (A)1.9 (INT)-2.7 (I)-10.9 (FF)12.7 (\222)2.9 (S)-3.9 ( R)1.9 (E)-3.7 (Q)-2 (U)1.9 (E)-12.9 (S)-4 (T)-2.2 (S)-4 ( F)10.1 (O)-1.9 (R)1.9 ( A)2.9 (D)2 (M)3.1 (IS)-4 (S)-4.9 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)-3.1 ( A)1.1 (N)2 (D)2 ( M)4.9 (O)-2 (N)2 (S)-4.8 (A)2.7 (N)2.1 (T)-3.8 (O)-2 (\222)3.8 (S)-4.8 ( R)1.9 (E)-2.9 (S)-3.1 (P)10.9 (O)-2.8 (N)2.8 (S)-4.8 (E)-3 (S)-3.1 ( )]TJ Notwithstanding said objections, no documents. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 306.23 0 Td << T* ( )Tj 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re Plaintiff further objects to this request to the extent that it relies upon the terms "statement" and "third parties." )2 (11)2 ( in )9.1 (P)-4.8 (l)-2 (a)14 (i)-1.9 (n)10.7 (t)7.1 (i)8.9 (f)2.2 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)3.2 (nd S)6 (up)9.9 (ple)11 (men)11.9 (t)-1.9 (a)3 (l )7.9 (R)-3.8 (e)14 (que)4.8 (s)8.1 (t)8.9 (s )-1.8 (f)1.1 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( )]TJ q ET /TT0 12 Tf (17)Tj [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2 (f)3.1 (\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (R)-3.9 (e)3.9 (que)4.9 (st)-3.8 (s)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o t)-2 (he)3.9 ( e)4.9 (x)-10.8 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (nt)-2 ( t)-1.1 (he)-6 (y)19.9 ( )-10.8 (c)4.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( f)2.9 (or)2.1 ( th)-2 (e)2 ( di)-1.8 (sc)2.7 (l)-11.9 (os)-1.1 (ur)3.8 (e)4 ( )]TJ T* /Fm0 Do endobj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm However, one of the objections I hadnt seen before: No preface or instruction shall be included with a set of interrogatories. 15.769 -24 Td [(t)-1.1 (ha)3.1 (t)-2 ( Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ha)4 (s )-2 (no)-2 (t)-3 ( c)3.9 (onduc)4.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ox)-10.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)30 ( st)-3.9 (udi)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-12 (of)3.8 ( sh)-1.8 (or)1.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 ( dur)-6 (a)3 (ti)-4 (ons,)-2 ( g)-2 (e)2.9 (n)-10.8 (ot)-2 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (t)-12 (y)30.8 ( st)-4.6 (udi)-2.1 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (, a)4.7 (nd )]TJ >> But if you make scant effort to explain why you are right, you might as well not object at all. This request, in essence, then, asks for the recollections of the attorneys representing the United States, or of the staff working under their direction, or for information contained in memoranda and notes prepared by those attorneys and their staff. 19 0 obj /TT0 12 Tf T* 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm SET NUMBER: ONE (1) To Plaintiff, Acme, Inc . /Length 155 0 R Q >> "Verbatim statements of a third party" include, but are not limited to, transcripts of the depositions of third parties, oral statements from any third party or its counsel, and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Eth /Ntilde /Ograve /Oacute /Ocircumflex /Otilde /Odieresis /multiply /Type /Page >> T* /Pages 8 0 R -36 -24 Td >> +(91)-9821210096 | how to say nevermind professionally in an email. 24 0 obj 5. q (24)Tj Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ T* 286.67 0 Td 41 0 obj endstream
11 0 obj 37.07 0 Td To the extent any of Defendant's document requests or its interrogatory seek documents or answers that include expert material, including but not limited to survey materials, Plaintiff objects to any such requests and interrogatory as premature and expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all responses to such requests, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s) in accordance with the time period for exchanging expert reports set by the Court. [(t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (s )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.9 (que)3.2 (st)-3.9 ( )10.8 (a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (wr)5 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (n. Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 (se)1.9 ( R)-2.8 (e)4.7 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.8 (un)-1.8 (r)-8.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (na)1.3 (b)-10 (l)-11.1 (y)19 ( c)4 (um)-1.9 (ul)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ve)4 ( )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd/)-1.9 (or)2.1 ( )]TJ Home; Service. Plaintiff's investigation and development of all facts and circumstances relating to this action is ongoing. (20)Tj << T* 29.4 648.61 Td 33 0 obj /Kids [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. >> /Type /Page << T* 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "third party" to those individuals and entities interviewed by Plaintiff pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009. endstream Q f 51.12 0 Td [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.6004 679.0819 Tm /Contents [56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R] /Resources 115 0 R 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm (25)Tj Q >> [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ !bxw:*5iQ
Judith M. Kinney (DSB # 3643) Assistant United States Attorney 1201 Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-6277, This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. q (3)Tj 36 -24 Td 0 0 m OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS. /TT0 12 Tf 51.12 0 Td /Rotate 0 /Font 153 0 R x[oJr)7 y$r$ YyAYO=_lr>$@lvWI}(PMYwUeM^u[|Qc]|,Wst]y_Uk]]5e]^./C+xYUnjw_ ZwjovxN4rE 7e];)c]vQB{g+Uf]uoOo;cpf~.}"nDz NUjK{UVMyuS,_,\_/%bwiG}eauS^B`Cc[^|+/>,1 F"H#wH~-Iu?[R q << (6)Tj ( )Tj Plaintiff objects to this document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of Plaintiff. 23.207 -24 Td /TT2 12 Tf Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). /Resources 71 0 R Q << /Contents [100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R] endobj /Font 129 0 R >> -315 -48 Td Q /TT1 12 Tf /Type /Page Sometimes called "attorney work product," and this objection applies equally to self-represented litigants. Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions. P)-4.7 (ur)3.7 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o )-10 (t)-2 (he)3.1 ( C)-2.1 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (f)2.1 (or)2.9 (ni)-1.8 (a)3.9 ( C)-3 (ode)4.8 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm << 5 regarding "third party" to the extent it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." /Resources 75 0 R [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ -283.67 -24 Td /CropBox [0 0 612 792] stream
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ 4 0 obj 36 -24 Td /Annots [] T* [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (w)1.8 (e)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( c)3.2 (ondu)-10 (c)4.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d be)3.2 (f)3 (or)-6.1 (e)3.1 ( 1991 a)4.8 (nd ot)-2.8 (he)-5.1 (r)-7.9 ( r)3.8 (e)-6.8 (g)10 (i)-1.1 (st)-4 (r)2.9 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.9 (s of)1.7 ( )-10 (g)10 (l)-21.1 (y)19 (phosa)3 (t)-1.9 (e)-5.1 (-)2.9 (ba)3.1 (se)3 (d he)-6.7 (r)2.8 (bi)-1.9 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (de)4.8 (s )]TJ (14)Tj 302.16 0 Td Q 121.796 -24 Td Q /Outlines 4 0 R [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( EP)-1.2 (A )2 (i)9.9 (nf)3 (or)13 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d Mo)7.2 (nsa)12.1 (nt)8.9 (o on J)-11.8 (ul)-12 (y)29.9 ( )30.9 (29, 1)-10 (985, t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (a)2 (f)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( E)11 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 (\222)13 (s )]TJ
Fairfield High School Class Of 2019,
Articles S